Cauchari-Olaroz — 2026 Technical Report

This technical report describes mineral processing and metallurgical testing for the Cauchari-Olaroz project, based on proposed design and historical operating data.

Report context

This technical report is dated April 2, 2026, and concerns the Cauchari-Olaroz project. The report presents mineral processing information based on original technical-report evidence that includes proposed plant design, historical operating data, and metallurgical testwork results. The project is a gold mine operation with associated processing infrastructure.

Processing route

Oxide and Free-Milling Circuit

The proposed processing plant comprises two largely independent circuits, each designed to accommodate distinct ore types based on mineralogical and metallurgical characteristics. The Oxide and Free-Milling Circuit is designed to process oxide, transition, and free-milling ore. The flowsheet includes standard crushing, ball milling, gravity recovery via Knelson concentrators, and a conventional carbon-in-leach (CIL) circuit.

Sulphide Refractory Circuit

The Sulphide Refractory Circuit is purpose-built for the treatment of sulphide refractory ore. The flowsheet consists of primary crushing, milling, flash and conventional flotation, ultrafine grinding (UFG), and cyanidation via a Pumpcell carbon-in-pulp (CIP) circuit. The flotation concentrate is subjected to a gravity flow pre-oxidation stage, followed by a leaching and CIP circuit.

Plant Performance and Flexibility

The processing plant averages 89% life-of-mine gold recovery (excluding optional flotation tails leaching), with a range of 78.4% to 96.4%. This variability stems from different free-milling and refractory ore types, necessitating blend control to optimise material routing through either the CIL circuit for oxide/free-milling ores or the flotation-UFG-leach circuit for sulphide refractory ores. This dual-circuit design provides operational flexibility as oxide and transitional ores deplete, allowing for partial retreatment of tailings to enhance overall recovery.

Metallurgical Testwork History

Since 2006, metallurgical test work has been conducted to characterise ore variability, define geometallurgical domains, and establish recovery parameters aligned with the current plant flowsheet. Key test work components have included Bottle Roll Leach Tests (BRT) to evaluate cyanide-soluble gold variability across different lithologies and domains, informing direct leachability and recovery modelling; Laboratory-Scale Plant Simulation Tests to assess comminution, gravity recovery, flotation (for sulphide association), and cyanidation leach to estimate overall recoveries; and Gold Deportment and Diagnostic Mineralogy to identify gold carriers and quantify refractory, free-milling, and encapsulated gold proportions, revealing metallurgical constraints.

Domain-Specific Testwork Results

Recovery results are domain-specific (oxide, transition, fresh) and show head grade and mineralogical variations. Results of recent test work completed to characterise new deposits or new domains are summarised as follows:

  • Rhino: Oxide samples achieved over 90% extraction, while transitional and fresh samples showed lower BRT extractions of approximately 83% and 72%, respectively. Subsequent plant simulation with finer grind yielded improved recoveries to 85% for both material types.
  • Agbarabo: Oxide and transition domains demonstrated strong direct-leach responses (greater than 90% and approximately 85%, respectively). High-grade fresh material was consistent, while low-grade fresh averaged approximately 75% (due to finer gold association), with further recovery improvements anticipated via UFG.
  • Airbo: Preliminary BRT on fresh material yielded 66% direct-cyanidation extraction. Additional flowsheet simulation test work (flotation, UFG, pre-oxidation/intensive leach) is ongoing.
  • Ndala: Oxide and transition domains achieved over 90% extraction. Fresh samples reported lower extraction (less than 75%) due to lower liberation, but additional extraction was achieved at a finer grind size.
  • Sessenge–Gorumbwa: Upper-lens samples averaged a low 61.45% recovery (linked to high arsenic content of approximately 2,500 ppm), whereas bottom lenses responded with higher gold extraction (greater than 70%).
  • Oere: Oxide domains achieved over 90% extraction, transition domains approximately 85%, and fresh samples around 82% (with recovery of 88% at finer grind).
  • KCD 11000 Lode and KCD Deep: Averages of approximately 82% and 79%, respectively, showing limited variability. However, significant recovery improvement with finer grind was achieved with both deposits reporting over 90%.

These outcomes are consistent with identified geometallurgical controls including preg-robbing and submicroscopic or occluded gold within sulphides. Where direct-cyanidation extractions are lower, test work indicates significant recovery uplift through flotation, ultrafine grinding, elevated dissolved oxygen, and adequate residence time. This supports a dual-route strategy: CIL for free-milling domains, and flotation-UFG-concentrate cyanidation for gold attached or enclosed within sulphides, especially in high-arsenic, refractory domains.

Key reported parameters

Parameter Value Basis
Plant design capacity 7.2 million tonnes per annum Design
Average LOM gold recovery 89% Design (excluding optional flotation tails leaching)
Gold recovery range 78.4% to 96.4% Design range
Rhino oxide BRT extraction Over 90% Testwork
Rhino transitional BRT extraction Approximately 83% Testwork
Rhino fresh BRT extraction Approximately 72% Testwork
Rhino transitional improved recovery (finer grind) 85% Testwork
Rhino fresh improved recovery (finer grind) 85% Testwork
Agbarabo oxide direct-leach Greater than 90% Testwork
Agbarabo transition direct-leach Approximately 85% Testwork
Agbarabo high-grade fresh Consistent Testwork
Agbarabo low-grade fresh average Approximately 75% Testwork
Airbo fresh BRT direct-cyanidation extraction 66% Testwork
Ndala oxide extraction Over 90% Testwork
Ndala transition extraction Over 90% Testwork
Ndala fresh extraction Less than 75% Testwork
Sessenge–Gorumbwa upper-lens average recovery 61.45% Testwork (high arsenic content approximately 2,500 ppm)
Sessenge–Gorumbwa bottom lenses extraction Greater than 70% Testwork
Oere oxide extraction Over 90% Testwork
Oere transition extraction Approximately 85% Testwork
Oere fresh extraction Approximately 82% Testwork
Oere fresh recovery at finer grind 88% Testwork
KCD 11000 Lode average recovery Approximately 82% Testwork
KCD Deep average recovery Approximately 79% Testwork
KCD deposits improved recovery with finer grind Over 90% Testwork
Total mine production 2025 8.322 million tonnes Historical operating data
2025 head grade 2.79 g/t Au Historical operating data
2025 gold production 673 thousand ounces Au Historical operating data
2025 recovery 90.31% Historical operating data

Project website: https://www.lithium-argentina.com/projects/cauchari-olaroz

Technical qualifications

The processing information in this report is based on proposed design, historical operating data, and metallurgical testwork results as described in the source technical report. No independent verification of metallurgical testwork data has been performed by the author of this article. The report does not contain economic analysis for material expansion of current annual production. The Qualified Persons note that mineral processing and metallurgical testing fundamentals are well established at the operation, with ore characterisation insights gained through ongoing test work and actual operations contributing to relatively high, consistent, and predictable gold recoveries.

Source: AngloGold Ashanti NI 43-101 Technical Report for Kibali Gold Mine, DRC – effective date 31 December 2025, dated April 2, 2026, Sections 1.7 (Mineral processing), 1.13.3 (Mineral processing conclusions), and related sections.

Mineral processing basics

Scroll to Top