NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources – Invicta Gold Project

Figure 41: Plant Operation – Flowsheet – SJE-Huari

A 2012 NI 43-101 technical report for the Invicta gold project in Peru describes metallurgical testwork and a proposed conventional flotation flowsheet producing separate copper and lead concentrates. The testwork reported here supersedes an earlier unconventional gravity–cyanidation–sequential flotation design.

Report context

This NI 43-101 technical report, effective April 6, 2012, was prepared by SRK Consulting (U.S.) for Andean American Gold Corp. covering the Invicta project in Huaura province, Peru. Section 11 of the report documents mineral processing and metallurgical testing, while Section 17.2 describes the proposed recovery methods.), with testwork undertaken at the National University of San Augustine of Arequipa, Peru. A single large composite sample exceeding one tonne was used. The report is a resource estimate and does not constitute a feasibility study; the processing description is based on testwork and a proposed commercial flowsheet, not an operating plant.

Processing route

The test programme moved from an earlier unconventional flowsheet (gravity concentration followed by cyanidation of gravity concentrate, then sequential flotation of copper, lead and zinc) to a conventional bulk copper-lead flotation route with subsequent copper-lead separation.

Feed preparation and bulk rougher flotation

The composite sample assayed 1.34% Cu, 1.32% Pb, 0.93% Zn, 5.95 g/t Au and 47 g/t Ag. Grind size optimisation tests indicated that a primary grind P80 of 200 mesh (75 micrometres) was optimum for recovery of copper, lead, gold and silver. At this grind size in the bulk Cu/Pb rougher circuit, recoveries were 69.97% Cu, 96.07% Pb, 60.36% Au and 80.31% Ag in an 8.19% mass pull grading 12.17% Cu, 15.91% Pb, 1.75% Zn, 43.08 g/t Au and 567.81 g/t Ag. Zinc minerals were depressed in the bulk circuit using zinc cyanide (Zn(CN)₂) at 300 g/t, identified as the optimum dosage. Higher addition (500–700 g/t) depressed copper, gold and silver.

Bulk cleaner flotation

Testing established that no regrind of the bulk Cu/Pb concentrate was required for the cleaner circuit. Two stages of cleaner flotation were sufficient for upgrading. A two-stage locked-cycle test (Test 89) produced a bulk first cleaner tail sent to final tailings and a second cleaner tail recycled to first cleaner feed. The bulk cleaner concentrate then reported to copper-lead separation.

Copper-lead separation

Over 30 rougher and bulk cleaner tests generated approximately 6 kg of bulk concentrate for separation testwork. After evaluating various reagent schemes, the selected approach was to depress lead minerals using sodium hydrosulfite and potassium dichromate while floating copper minerals. The copper concentrate was cleaned once to reject additional lead.

Locked-cycle test results (proposed design basis)

Duplicate locked-cycle tests (Tests 89 and 90) provided the metallurgical basis for plant design. From a calculated feed grading approximately 1.42–1.44% Cu, 1.83–1.87% Pb, 1.20–1.23% Zn, 5.17–5.41 g/t Au and 51–55 g/t Ag, the following concentrate products were reported:

  • Copper concentrate: 31.25–31.45% Cu, 110.67–113.18 g/t Au, 645.78–652.17 g/t Ag. Recoveries to copper concentrate: 79.7–83.3% Cu, 77.3–80.5% Au, 45.3–45.5% Ag.
  • Lead concentrate: 48.54–57.20% Pb, 8.31–13.33 g/t Au, 620.99–644.19 g/t Ag. Recoveries to lead concentrate: 82.2–82.4% Pb, 4.8–6.9% Au, 33.8–34.9% Ag.

Pilot plant confirmation

A pilot plant with capacity 125 kg/h was operated semi-continuously using the bench-scale flowsheet to confirm process performance and generate material for sedimentation and filtration testing. The overall metallurgical balance (Table 11.2.7.1) showed results similar to the locked-cycle tests. Pilot plant concentrate grades by ICP analysis were:

  • Copper concentrate: 31.3% Cu, 3.47% Pb, 1.77% Zn, 28.05% Fe, 32.2% S, 113 ppm Au, 647 ppm Ag
  • Lead concentrate: 53.6% Pb, 2.81% Cu, 3.94% Zn, 9.22% Fe, 9.52% S, 9.75 ppm Au, 623 ppm Ag

Hexavalent chromium (Cr⁺⁶) in recovered water was generally below 0.4 ppm when potassium dichromate addition was less than 90 g/t. Gold, silver, copper and lead losses in bulk tailings were predominantly in the minus 325 mesh fraction. Open and locked-cycle tests with increased solids loading from 32% to 40% in the bulk rougher/scavenger circuit showed increased recovery and decreased reagent consumption.

Proposed commercial flowsheet

The proposed plant flowsheet (Figure 17-1 in the report) comprised:

  • Grinding to P80 200 mesh with zinc depressant added in the mill
  • Bulk Cu-Pb rougher-scavenger flotation
  • Two stages of bulk cleaner flotation (first cleaner tail to final tailings; second cleaner tail recycled to first cleaner feed)
  • Copper-lead separation circuit (lead depressed, copper floated)
  • Single cleaning stage for copper concentrate
  • Filtration of both concentrates for transport and sale

Zinc recovery from rougher tailings was tested but not incorporated into the flowsheet at this stage.

Tailings and water

The report references that pilot plant concentrates and tailings were used for settling and filtration testing to generate design parameters for commercial operation, but no specific settling or filtration results are provided in the cited sections.

Reagents

Key reagents identified: zinc cyanide (Zn(CN)₂) at 300 g/t as zinc depressant in bulk flotation; sodium hydrosulfite and potassium dichromate for lead depression in the separation circuit. Potassium dichromate addition below 90 g/t maintained Cr⁺⁶ below 0.4 ppm in recovered water.

Key reported parameters

Parameter Value Basis
Feed grind size P80 200 mesh (75 µm) Testwork optimum
Bulk rougher flotation time 8–14 minutes Testwork
Solids loading (rougher/scavenger) 32–40% Testwork (higher loading beneficial)
Copper concentrate grade 31.35% Cu, 111.93 g/t Au, 648.98 g/t Ag Average of duplicate locked-cycle tests
Lead concentrate grade 52.87% Pb, 10.82 g/t Au, 632.59 g/t Ag Average of duplicate locked-cycle tests
Cu recovery to copper concentrate 81.5% Average of locked-cycle tests
Pb recovery to lead concentrate 82.3% Average of locked-cycle tests
Au recovery to copper concentrate 78.9% Average of locked-cycle tests
Au recovery to lead concentrate 5.9% Average of locked-cycle tests
Ag recovery to copper concentrate 45.4% Average of locked-cycle tests
Ag recovery to lead concentrate 34.4% Average of locked-cycle tests
Overall Au recovery (before smelter deductions) 84.8% Estimated plant recovery from locked-cycle tests
Overall Ag recovery (before smelter deductions) 79.8% Estimated plant recovery from locked-cycle tests
Plant feed grade (recovery estimate basis) 1.42% Cu, 1.85% Pb, 1.20% Zn, 5.38 g/t Au, 53.28 g/t Ag Locked-cycle test composite
Pilot plant capacity 125 kg/h Design/testwork
Zn(CN)₂ addition 300 g/t Optimum determined in testwork
K₂Cr₂O₇ addition limit <90 g/t To maintain Cr⁺⁶ <0.4 ppm

Project website: https://www.bluefieldresearch.com/our-products/water-market-insights/

Technical qualifications

This profile is based solely on a 2012 NI 43-101 technical report for the Invicta gold project. The processing description represents metallurgical testwork results and a proposed commercial flowsheet, not an operating plant. All recovery figures are before smelter deductions and are not payable recoveries. The report is a resource estimate with historical mineral reserve estimates; no economic analysis or reserve calculation from this report is reproduced here. The pilot plant operated for a few days only and its results are confirmatory rather than production data. The report does not provide flowsheet diagrams, equipment sizes or detailed plant design parameters. Zinc flotation was tested but not incorporated into the proposed flowsheet. No current project status, ownership or operational history is stated in the cited sections.

Source: NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources – Invicta Gold Project, Huaura Province, Peru. Effective date April 6, 2012, report date April 16, 2012. Prepared by SRK Consulting (U.S.) for Andean American Gold Corporation. Sections 11 (Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing) and 17.2 (Recovery Methods).

Consolidated report summaries

The following former standalone pages about this operation were consolidated here on October 25, 2026. They are retained for source traceability; dates and figures reflect each report’s own effective date and may be superseded by the current information above.

Invicta Gold Project — 2012 Technical Report

Invicta Gold Project — 2012 Technical Report

Company PC/SC Andean-Invicta
Date 2012
Commodities Gold, Copper, Lead, Silver

Executive Summary

This section of the NI 43-101 Technical Report details the recovery methods and pilot plant results for the Invicta Gold Project. Based on locked-cycle test results, metallurgical balances were prepared for two tests conducted in a semi-continuous pilot plant using several tonnes of representative samples. The process successfully produced two distinct concentrates: a copper concentrate and a lead concentrate, with overall recoveries and grades summarized in the associated tables.

The conventional processing method utilized for the recovery of copper, lead, gold, and silver minerals involved grinding the mineralized material to a P80 of 200 mesh (75 micrometers) with the addition of zinc depressants in the mill. A bulk Cu-Pb concentrate was floated in the rougher-scavenger circuit, followed by a two-stage cleaning process. The second bulk cleaner concentrate was then processed in a separation circuit where lead minerals were depressed and copper minerals were floated, with the copper concentrate undergoing a final cleaning stage.

The metallurgical results indicated strong recovery performance for the target commodities. The lead concentrate assayed 52.87% Pb with 82.3% recovery, while the copper concentrate assayed 31.35% Cu with 81.5% recovery. Overall gold and silver recoveries before smelter deductions were calculated at 84.8% and 79.8%, respectively. The final concentrates are designed to be filtered, transported, and sold.

Reports

  • reports/2012_PCSCAndeanInvicta_InvictaGoldProject

Website: https://www.tsx.com/en/resource/682/12-en-3.xls

Report Date: 2012

Region: 

Project Status:

Commodity: Gold, Copper, Lead, Silver

Throughput: 

Mine Life: 

Mine Type: 

Ore type:

Technical Report on the Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Invicta Gold Project

Technical Report on the Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Invicta Gold Project

Company Lupaka Gold Corp.
Date 2018-04-13
Region Huaura Province, Peru
Commodities Gold, Silver, Lead, Copper, Zinc
Status Preliminary Economic Assessment

Executive Summary

This technical report outlines the Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Invicta Gold Project, located in Huaura Province, Peru. A key operational assumption is that run of mine material will be trucked to a third-party toll processing facility located in Caraz, central Peru, rather than building an on-site plant. The toll treatment agreement covers receiving, weighing, sampling, processing, reagents, maintenance, and tailings deposition.

Metallurgical testwork indicates that conventional flotation technology is suitable for treating the mineralized material. The proposed flowsheet includes crushing, grinding via a rod mill and ball mill, and classification using cyclones. The flotation circuit consists of a bulk flotation stage for lead, copper, gold, and silver, followed by zinc flotation and a selective copper/lead separation circuit. Concentrates are thickened, filtered, and transported to third-party smelters.

The report assumes transportation logistics via national highways, with feed traveling 413 km from the project to Caraz and concentrates traveling 484 km from Caraz to the port of Callao. This processing selection is preliminary and subject to change based on further metallurgical studies.

Website: https://www.lupakagold.com/

Report Date: 2018-04-13

Region: Huaura Province, Peru

Project Status: Preliminary Economic Assessment

Commodity: Gold, Silver, Lead, Copper, Zinc

Throughput: 

Mine Life: 

Mine Type: 

Ore type:

Mineral processing basics

Scroll to Top