Slick Rock Ore Would Go to the Restarted Shootaring Canyon Mill, a 750 t/d SAG, Two-Stage Acid Leach and SX Plant With Added Vanadium Recovery

Anfield Energy's May 2023 preliminary economic assessment for the Shootaring Canyon mill and the Velvet-Wood and Slick Rock uranium projects assumes new equipment in the mill's original building in Utah.

The Shootaring Canyon Mill and Velvet-Wood and Slick Rock Uranium Projects Preliminary Economic Assessment, NI 43-101, was prepared by BRS Inc. and T.P. McNulty and Associates for Anfield Energy Inc. and dated May 6, 2023. Ore from the Velvet-Wood and Slick Rock mines, plus stockpiled material, would be processed at the Shootaring Canyon mill in Ticaboo, Utah. Mountain States Engineers built the mill around 1981 for Plateau Resources, at a design capacity of 750 short tons per day, and it ran only briefly before 1982. It holds a radioactive materials licence, which would need amending before operations could resume. Some equipment, including the CCD thickeners and pumps, has since been salvaged and sold, but the main process building is described as well designed and in generally very good condition.

Critical Data

Parameter Value Unit Notes
Report date May 6, 2023 Not applicable BRS Inc. for Anfield Energy Inc.
Mill design capacity 750 short tons/d Uranium ore; built about 1981
PEA basis New equipment in the original building Not applicable Refurbishing would save about $4 million
SAG mill (original) 12 ft x 6.5 ft, 250 hp Not applicable 6 inch balls, 8 to 10% charge
Classification Four DSM sieve bends, 28 mesh Not applicable 200% circulating load
First-stage leach Three tanks, 2 h at 29% solids Not applicable Sulphuric acid and sodium chlorate
Second-stage leach Four tanks, 16 h at 48.8% solids Not applicable 93% uranium dissolution anticipated
Reagent design 140 lb 93% H2SO4 and 1.171 lb NaClO3 per dry ton Not applicable Original design criteria
Leach pH for vanadium 0.8 to 1.2 Not applicable Instead of 1.5 to 2.0 for uranium alone
CCD Six stages Not applicable Above 99% washing efficiency
Solvent extraction Alamine 336 with isodecanol in kerosene Not applicable Tertiary amine extractant

Overview

The PEA limited its processing costs to the original conventional grinding and agitated leaching circuit, followed by yellowcake precipitation, drying and drum filling. Two options were considered: refurbishing the original equipment with replacements where needed, which would save roughly $4 million, or installing all new equipment in the original building. The PEA uses the second, more expensive option as a conservative measure, because it brings current equipment and best available technology. Both options add vanadium recovery. Leaching would run at a higher free acid concentration, pH 0.8 to 1.2 rather than 1.5 to 2.0, to extract the vanadium, and a vanadium circuit would treat uranium SX raffinate in a small new building next to the mill.

The report notes that the mill was among the last two or three conventional uranium mills built before the industry collapsed, and that its design drew on two decades of improvements. Examples include SAG milling of run-of-mine ore in place of crushing and rod milling, and DSM sieve bends in place of rake or spiral classifiers. Process solutions were heated through the diesel generators' radiators and blocks to speed up leaching. Other features were two-stage leaching to cut acid use, acid-resistant wood-stave leach tanks, high-rate deep CCD thickeners, extensive process instrumentation, and centrifuging of thickened yellowcake before filtering and drying.

Key Process Stages

Ore handling. A front-end loader reclaims run-of-mine ore from a storage area onto a 14 inch grizzly. A surge bin of about 75 t and an apron feeder feed a 3 inch stationary grizzly and a 42 inch mill feed conveyor with a metal detector, belt scale and wet dust scrubber.

Grinding. The SAG mill produces slurry at 65 to 70% solids, which is pumped to four DSM sieve bends with 28 mesh slots. Oversize returns by gravity to the mill, and undersize goes to two wood-stave leach feed holding tanks.

Two-stage leaching. Tetravalent uranium is oxidized with sodium chlorate and dissolved with sulphuric acid. In the first stage, three tanks give two hours at 29% solids, using overflow from the first CCD thickener. A thickener then raises the slurry to about 50% solids for the second stage, four tanks giving 16 hours at 48.8% solids.

CCD washing. Six thickeners wash the residue, with SX raffinate entering at the last one. Five are high-rate units at 50% underflow solids. The last is a high-density unit at up to 60% solids, pumped to the tailings impoundment, from which supernatant is reclaimed.

Clarification. Leach thickener overflow passes a clarifier, at no more than 50 ppm solids, and three automatically backwashed sand filters, at no more than 10 ppm solids, before PLS storage.

Solvent extraction and product. Uranium is concentrated and purified by solvent extraction with Alamine 336, then precipitated as yellowcake, which is thickened, centrifuged, filtered, dried and drummed. The new design would include a fully automated drum filling station that also removes and replaces the drum clamp ring, reducing operator exposure to dust.

Additional Interesting Data and Summary

A 2008 definitive restart estimate by Lyntek proposed full refurbishment with some new CCD thickeners, pumps, instruments and scrubbers. The 2023 PEA instead assumes complete replacement of the equipment, while noting that a new building would cost about $4 to $7 million plus demolition, so the original structure is kept.

In summary, the 2023 PEA would process Slick Rock and Velvet-Wood ore at the restarted Shootaring Canyon mill. It keeps the mill's 1981 SAG, two-stage acid leach, CCD and amine SX flowsheet, re-equipped with modern units, and runs the leach more aggressively so that vanadium can also be recovered.

Key Processes

  • Grizzly screening and SAG milling of run-of-mine ore
  • DSM sieve bend classification
  • Two-stage sulphuric acid and sodium chlorate leaching
  • Six-stage countercurrent decantation
  • Clarification and sand filtration of pregnant solution
  • Amine solvent extraction of uranium
  • Yellowcake precipitation, centrifuging, drying and drumming
  • Vanadium recovery from SX raffinate (new circuit)

Source: The Shootaring Canyon Mill and Velvet-Wood and Slick Rock Uranium Projects, Preliminary Economic Assessment, National Instrument 43-101, prepared for Anfield Energy Inc., dated May 6, 2023.

Earlier report summaries

Earlier versions of this profile, based on older technical reports, are retained below for source traceability. Dates and figures reflect each report’s own effective date and are superseded by the current information above.

Slick Rock Project — 2014 PEA

Slick Rock Project — 2014 PEA

Company Uranium Energy Corporation
Date April 2014
Region Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado, USA
Commodities Uranium
Status Preliminary Economic Assessment

Executive Summary

This 2014 Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Slick Rock Project outlines a strategy centered on the sale of mineralized material to the White Mesa mill in Blanding, Utah, rather than on-site processing. The project is located within the Uravan Mineral Belt, an area with a 50-year history of successful uranium and vanadium processing. As of April 2014, the White Mesa mill was processing alternative feeds, but management confirmed willingness to resume run-of-mine processing and toll milling agreements if uranium prices warranted it.

A significant risk identified is the potential refusal of the White Mesa mill to accept run-of-mine material. In such a scenario, on-site mineral processing would be required. The report recommends evaluating alternative recovery methods, specifically vat or heap leaching, which have been practiced successfully in the Uravan Mineral Belt historically. These methods could produce intermediate products like concentrated liquor or loaded resin for shipment to other facilities.

The project benefits from its proximity to a DOE Legacy site, which serves as the permanent repository for former Slick Rock mill tailings. This site was selected based on US NRC criteria for long-term disposal and isolation. Siting a new uranium processing facility in this similar geographic and geologic setting could facilitate the licensing process by referencing past studies and evaluations regarding engineering and environmental studies.

Website: https://anfieldenergy.com/slick-rock-project-2/

Report Date: April 2014

Region: Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado, USA

Project Status: Preliminary Economic Assessment

Commodity: Uranium

Ore type:

Mineral processing basics

Scroll to Top